Today's hottest deals

Micro Venus Series

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive137% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro Venus Series  (all builds)
MotherboardShenzhen DNBIB
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231204
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 03 '24 at 20:32
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel N100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 0.8 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Memory 53.6
1-Core 101
2-Core 192
63% 116 Pts
4-Core 331
8-Core 333
44% 332 Pts
64-Core 333
21% 333 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1F4C B010) 128MB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.5522
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
3.48% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 6.8
Parallax 4.3
3% 4.93 fps
MRender 6.3
Gravity 4.8
Splatting 5.1
4% 5.4 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.48%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ESO512GTLCW-EP3-2L 512GB
427GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFMG1.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 596 600 384 315 320 320 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
137% Outstanding
Read 548
Write 594
Mixed 576
SusWrite 422
121% 535 MB/s
4K Read 43.6
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 59.2
195% 67.8 MB/s
DQ Read 827
DQ Write 443
DQ Mixed 588
450% 619 MB/s
Poor: 137%
This bench: 137%
Great: 201%
Micron CT1000X 1TB
599GB free
Firmware: PMAP
SusWrite @10s intervals: 661 666 677 653 671 685 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 46% Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
66.2% Good
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 25.2
72% 25.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 18.3
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 147
27% 147 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 23 3 60 40" 1280 720 SKY1302 TV-monitor
Typical Venus Series Builds (Compare 200 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Micro Venus Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback