Today's hottest deals

Micro UM690

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics33.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive292% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro UM690  (all builds)
MotherboardShenzhen F7BFC
Memory18.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230215
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 07 '24 at 06:34
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 77.1
1-Core 177
2-Core 350
106% 201 Pts
4-Core 684
8-Core 1,184
113% 934 Pts
64-Core 1,426
88% 1,426 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 102%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
AMD(1002 1681) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.20.13.01
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
33.1% Below average
Lighting 44.5
Reflection 55.3
Parallax 79.2
36% 59.7 fps
MRender 24.9
Gravity 47.7
Splatting 27.9
27% 33.5 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000P3SSD8 1TB
850GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR311
SusWrite @10s intervals: 648 299 463 2551 277 309 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
292% Outstanding
Read 2,060
Write 2,445
Mixed 2,266
SusWrite 758
424% 1,882 MB/s
4K Read 71.3
4K Write 226
4K Mixed 104
360% 134 MB/s
DQ Read 1,320
DQ Write 986
DQ Mixed 1,230
899% 1,179 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 292%
Great: 394%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
183GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 413 302 303 302 303 302 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 489
Mixed 422
SusWrite 321
98% 434 MB/s
4K Read 43.6
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 61
212% 77.7 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 353
266% 357 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 122%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance SODIM 4800 C40 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
122% Outstanding
MC Read 44.2
MC Write 49
MC Mixed 41.5
128% 44.9 GB/s
SC Read 26.3
SC Write 49.9
SC Mixed 31.6
103% 35.9 GB/s
Latency 86
46% 86 ns
Poor: 112%
This bench: 122%
Great: 154%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 54 75 31.5" 1280 720 PHLC21B PHL 327E8QJ
Typical UM690 Builds (Compare 29 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat

System: Micro UM690

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback