Today's hottest deals

Danawa RDEA-ED-E5MAD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics8.28% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive330% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemDanawa RDEA-ED-E5MAD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Pro H610M-C
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230329
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 09 '24 at 06:57
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12500-$189
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Memory 77.5
1-Core 167
2-Core 312
99% 186 Pts
4-Core 558
8-Core 1,061
96% 810 Pts
64-Core 1,267
78% 1,267 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 770
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.1109
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
8.28% Terrible
Lighting 9.4
Reflection 14.1
Parallax 10.9
8% 11.5 fps
MRender 12.5
Gravity 12.8
Splatting 10.1
10% 11.8 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.28%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 512GB
379GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXA7801Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1306 2032 2067 847 847 852 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
330% Outstanding
Read 2,134
Write 2152
Mixed 2,012
SusWrite 1325
429% 1,906 MB/s
4K Read 58.7
4K Write 202
4K Mixed 110
336% 123 MB/s
DQ Read 1,461
DQ Write 1,137
DQ Mixed 1,410
1,024% 1,336 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 330%
Great: 421%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M323R2GA3BB0-CQKOL 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
78.4% Very good
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 26.2
81% 28.4 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 28.7
SC Mixed 19.9
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 88
46% 88 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 27" 1280 720 SAM7097 LF27T450F
Typical RDEA-ED-E5MAD Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Danawa RDEA-ED-E5MAD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 110% - Outstanding Total price: $189
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback