Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA507NU_FA507NU

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics31.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA507NU_FA507NU  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FA507NU
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230811
Uptime3.5 Days
Run DateJun 10 '24 at 21:00
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Memory 68.3
1-Core 84.6
2-Core 164
60% 106 Pts
4-Core 277
8-Core 525
48% 401 Pts
64-Core 846
52% 846 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Asus(1043 14C3) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.40.50
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31.4% Below average
Lighting 42.6
Reflection 49.5
Parallax 79
35% 57 fps
MRender 23
Gravity 44
Splatting 26
25% 31 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-512G-1002 512GB
379GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 73101000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,774
Write 1,280
Mixed 1,414
331% 1,489 MB/s
4K Read 39.9
4K Write 62.2
4K Mixed 42.3
148% 48.1 MB/s
DQ Read 530
DQ Write 127
DQ Mixed 380
266% 346 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 465%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MTC4C10163S1SC56BD1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
105% Outstanding
MC Read 40.9
MC Write 38.9
MC Mixed 38.8
113% 39.5 GB/s
SC Read 19
SC Write 33.2
SC Mixed 27.2
76% 26.5 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 105%
This bench: 105%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 52 144 15.5" 1280 720 CMN1556 N156HMA-GA1
Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA507NU_FA507NU Builds (Compare 48 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA507NU_FA507NU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback