2036857601 157607898

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics96.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive174% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
System2036857601 157607898  (all builds)
MotherboardMACHINIST E5-MR9A
Memory27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221025
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 13 '24 at 02:23
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Memory 82.8
1-Core 80.7
2-Core 163
64% 109 Pts
4-Core 339
8-Core 534
54% 436 Pts
64-Core 695
43% 695 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$150
AMD(1002 0000) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.5.1
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
96.9% Outstanding
Lighting 124
Reflection 183
Parallax 200
101% 169 fps
MRender 107
Gravity 138
Splatting 88.1
89% 111 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 104%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Asgard AN512NVMe-M.2/80 512GB
342GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN02665 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1464 1398 722 572 530 523 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
174% Outstanding
Read 1163
Write 1,249
Mixed 454
SusWrite 868
209% 934 MB/s
4K Read 41.2
4K Write 74.2
4K Mixed 50.7
167% 55.4 MB/s
DQ Read 660
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 537
389% 512 MB/s
Poor: 95%
This bench: 174%
Great: 245%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown VMA45UG-MEC1U22T3 VMA45UG-MEC1U22T3 32GB
2400, 2133, 2400, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
88.7% Excellent
MC Read 34
MC Write 37.3
MC Mixed 31.5
98% 34.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 18.9
46% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 75.6
53% 75.6 ns
Poor: 89%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 165 27" 1280 720 VIE2700 H270F165
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback