Today's hottest deals

Acer Nitro ANV15-51

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics12.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive346% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Nitro ANV15-51  (all builds)
MotherboardRPL Sportage_RTH
Memory15.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240108
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 14 '24 at 12:55
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13420H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Memory 55.2
1-Core 171
2-Core 358
98% 195 Pts
4-Core 661
8-Core 961
101% 811 Pts
64-Core 1,200
74% 1,200 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Acer(1025 171E) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4146
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Lighting 13.4
Reflection 21.1
Parallax 15.6
11% 16.7 fps
MRender 20.1
Gravity 17.6
Splatting 18.6
15% 18.8 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SM2P41C8-512GC1 512GB
331GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1223C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1849 1610 1519 1088 1212 1182 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
346% Outstanding
Read 2,064
Write 2,950
Mixed 2,008
SusWrite 1,410
476% 2,108 MB/s
4K Read 62.1
4K Write 266
4K Mixed 93.8
355% 141 MB/s
DQ Read 1,741
DQ Write 1,358
DQ Mixed 1,413
1,094% 1,504 MB/s
Poor: 112%
This bench: 346%
Great: 346%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Midgard Adata AI1V56WC8W1-B1CS 24GB
4800, 5600 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
95.5% Outstanding
MC Read 40.3
MC Write 34.2
MC Mixed 33.6
103% 36 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 31.8
SC Mixed 24.3
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 31: 0P 3R 3G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
31% 32% 40 214 55 144 15.5" 1280 720 LGD0742
Typical Nitro ANV15-51 Builds (Compare 495 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: Acer Nitro ANV15-51

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback