MSI Z170A-G43 PLUS (MS-7970)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics65.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7970
MotherboardMSI Z170A-G43 PLUS (MS-7970)  (all builds)
Memory7.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170418
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJan 14 '18 at 16:24
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$120
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Memory 84.4
1-Core 121
2-Core 275
87% 160 Pts
4-Core 353
8-Core 496
53% 424 Pts
64-Core 513
32% 513 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
MSI(1462 3176) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.65
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
65.1% Good
Lighting 83.8
Reflection 83.3
Parallax 81.7
68% 82.9 fps
MRender 79
Gravity 74.9
Splatting 65.4
59% 73.1 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD103SI 500GB
302GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
128% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 497
Mixed 506
113% 504 MB/s
4K Read 43.9
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 57
198% 70.4 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 153
170% 289 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 128%
Great: 128%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
231GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
883GB free
Firmware: CC25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
92% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 151
Mixed 145
117% 155 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.34
4K Mixed 0.18
63% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 92%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLE8G4D26AFEA.16FAD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
79.5% Very good
MC Read 28.9
MC Write 31.7
MC Mixed 26
82% 28.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 29.5
SC Mixed 17.7
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170A-G43 PLUS (MS-7970) Builds (Compare 245 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

Motherboard: MSI Z170A-G43 PLUS (MS-7970)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $667
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback