Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-Z590 GAMING X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics57.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive518% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z590 GAMING X  (all builds)
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230607
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 17 '24 at 14:47
Run Duration305 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11600K-$181
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
98% Outstanding
Memory 83.4
1-Core 161
2-Core 318
100% 188 Pts
4-Core 604
8-Core 960
96% 782 Pts
64-Core 1,178
73% 1,178 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 98%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 555.99
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
57.2% Above average
Lighting 71.3
Reflection 73.8
Parallax 67.7
58% 70.9 fps
MRender 67
Gravity 70.6
Splatting 66.1
56% 67.9 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SKC3000S1024G 1TB
875GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIFK51.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4217 4479 4464 4380 4326 4355 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
518% Outstanding
Read 2,209
Write 3,288
Mixed 2,687
SusWrite 4,370
714% 3,138 MB/s
4K Read 55.2
4K Write 242
4K Mixed 96
335% 131 MB/s
DQ Read 1,516
DQ Write 1,154
DQ Mixed 1,411
1,034% 1,361 MB/s
Poor: 237%
This bench: 518%
Great: 518%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$50
51GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 417 410 410 401 407 400 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 432
Write 400
Mixed 382
SusWrite 408
91% 405 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 84.9
4K Mixed 47.2
155% 55 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 286
232% 329 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 106%
Great: 125%
Transcend SSD370S 128GB-$59
12GB free
Firmware: O1225G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 145 102 90 70 64 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
78.9% Very good
Read 450
Write 199
Mixed 241
SusWrite 112
55% 250 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 86.2
4K Mixed 40.1
140% 51.6 MB/s
DQ Read 270
DQ Write 205
DQ Mixed 176
148% 217 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 90%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$116
931GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2015 2019 1525 1466 1442 1481 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
326% Outstanding
Read 2,276
Write 2,052
Mixed 1,660
SusWrite 1,658
429% 1,912 MB/s
4K Read 55.4
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 72.6
236% 79.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,428
DQ Write 1,271
DQ Mixed 1,330
1,003% 1,343 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 326%
Great: 410%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
32GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 111 95 95 89 114 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Read 104
Write 101
Mixed 61.6
SusWrite 101
67% 91.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
118% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$40
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.7% Good
MC Read 27.6
MC Write 23.6
MC Mixed 19.9
68% 23.7 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 21.3
SC Mixed 17.7
55% 19.4 GB/s
Latency 73.8
54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 24" 1280 720 BNQ78CE BenQ GL2460
Typical GA-Z590 GAMING X Builds (Compare 4,400 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 150%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 150%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z590 GAMING X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $715
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback