Acer Aspire 4810T

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire 4810T  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire 4810T
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090929
Uptime2 Days
Run DateJan 14 '18 at 19:29
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel U4100
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
27% Poor
Memory 49.5
1-Core 14.5
2-Core 27.4
23% 30.5 Pts
4-Core 28
8-Core 31.2
4% 29.6 Pts
64-Core 32.5
2% 32.5 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 27%
Great: 34%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4300
Acer(1025 022A) 512MB
Driver: atiumd64.dll Ver. 8.652.1.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.06% Terrible
Lighting 1.27
Reflection 1.73
Parallax 1.12
1% 1.37 fps
MRender 1.86
Gravity 0.53
Splatting 1.65
1% 1.35 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.06%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 240GB-$70
158GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 501A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43% Average
Read 251
Write 214
Mixed 207
50% 224 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 26.1
4K Mixed 11.8
54% 18.2 MB/s
DQ Read 91.3
DQ Write 75.4
DQ Mixed 47.9
46% 71.5 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 43%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown EBJ41UF8BCS0-DJ-F 80AD HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 8GB
800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
12.6% Very poor
MC Read 4.6
MC Write 3.7
MC Mixed 3.6
11% 3.97 GB/s
SC Read 4
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 3.5
11% 3.77 GB/s
Latency 163
25% 163 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire 4810T Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire 4810T

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback