Today's hottest deals

Razer Blade 16 - RZ09-0510

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemRazer Blade 16 - RZ09-0510  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer SO6100
Memory50.5 GB free of 64 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2400 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 22 '24 at 06:38
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-14900HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Memory 61.8
1-Core 168
2-Core 297
92% 175 Pts
4-Core 486
8-Core 745
76% 615 Pts
64-Core 1,221
76% 1,221 Pts
Poor: 111%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 122%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090 (Laptop)
Device(1A58 300A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 555.99
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
113% Outstanding
Lighting 128
Reflection 216
Parallax 0.2
105% 115 fps
MRender 259
Gravity 150
Splatting 126
140% 178 fps
Poor: 144%
This bench: 113%
Great: 243%
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1A58 300A) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.5081
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
7.04% Terrible
Lighting 8
Reflection 11.9
Parallax 8.7
6% 9.53 fps
MRender 9.9
Gravity 11
Splatting 8.9
8% 9.93 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.04%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL22T0HBLB-00B00 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXB7801Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,417
Write 2,888
Mixed 2,717
600% 2,674 MB/s
4K Read 60.1
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 75.8
246% 81.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,143
DQ Write 800
DQ Mixed 947
714% 963 MB/s
Poor: 225% Great: 508%
Samsung MZVL22T0HBLB-00B00 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: GXB7801Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,519
Write 2,940
Mixed 2,739
613% 2,732 MB/s
4K Read 61.6
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 78.9
253% 83.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,208
DQ Write 846
DQ Mixed 1,001
754% 1,018 MB/s
Poor: 225% Great: 508%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MTC16C2085S1SC56BD1 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
MC Read 44.4
MC Write 26.3
MC Mixed 38.5
104% 36.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 33.4
SC Mixed 23.1
68% 24 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 104%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 182%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 62 45 120 24" 1280 720 GSM5B73 LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical Blade 16 - RZ09-0510 Builds (Compare 39 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 237%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 119%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 292%
UFO

System: Razer Blade 16 - RZ09-0510

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback