Today's hottest deals

Razer Blade 16 - RZ09-0510

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 112%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics8.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive294% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemRazer Blade 16 - RZ09-0510  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer SO6100
Memory52.2 GB free of 64 GB
Display3840 x 2400 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231222
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateAug 30 '24 at 02:26
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-14900HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Memory 71.1
1-Core 221
2-Core 430
123% 241 Pts
4-Core 814
8-Core 1,508
139% 1,161 Pts
64-Core 3,005
186% 3,005 Pts
Poor: 111%
This bench: 112%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1A58 300A) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.5081
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
8.5% Terrible
Lighting 9.2
Reflection 14
Parallax 10.1
8% 11.1 fps
MRender 12.9
Gravity 13.5
Splatting 12.1
10% 12.8 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.5%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL22T0HBLB-00B00 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXB7801Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1973 2003 2038 2037 2024 2101 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
294% Outstanding
Read 2,030
Write 1,690
Mixed 1,842
SusWrite 2,029
428% 1,898 MB/s
4K Read 49.4
4K Write 80.5
4K Mixed 60.9
196% 63.6 MB/s
DQ Read 834
DQ Write 432
DQ Mixed 608
458% 625 MB/s
Poor: 225%
This bench: 294%
Great: 508%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MTC16C2085S1SC56BD1 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 41.2
MC Write 37.4
MC Mixed 42.3
115% 40.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 28.5
SC Mixed 19.2
59% 20.7 GB/s
Latency 97.5
41% 97.5 ns
Poor: 104%
This bench: 104%
Great: 182%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 120 16" 1920 1129 AUO8EA6
Typical Blade 16 - RZ09-0510 Builds (Compare 39 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 237%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 119%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 292%
UFO

System: Razer Blade 16 - RZ09-0510

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback