Cyberpowerpc GamingPC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 115%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics399% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemCyberpowerpc GamingPC  (all builds)
MotherboardMicro-Star MPG X670E CARBON WIFI (MS-7D70)
Memory83.2 GB free of 96 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240527
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 24 '24 at 22:41
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D-$475
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Memory 78.1
1-Core 206
2-Core 412
120% 232 Pts
4-Core 809
8-Core 1,576
141% 1,192 Pts
64-Core 3,628
225% 3,628 Pts
Poor: 114%
This bench: 115%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,500
CLim: 3165 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 555.99
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
399% Outstanding
Lighting 646
Reflection 582
Parallax 729
526% 652 fps
MRender 534
Gravity 573
Splatting 310
370% 472 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 399%
Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair MP700 PRO 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: EQFM22.1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 5,942
Write 5,898
Mixed 3383
1,128% 5,074 MB/s
4K Read 62.4
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 80.2
258% 85.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,550
DQ Write 736
DQ Mixed 1,360
952% 1,215 MB/s
Poor: 460% Great: 828%
Samsung 870 EVO 4TB-$350
3.5TB free
Firmware: SVT03B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 515
Write 488
Mixed 462
109% 488 MB/s
4K Read 41.6
4K Write 82.6
4K Mixed 54.2
176% 59.5 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 372
280% 374 MB/s
Poor: 90% Great: 137%
Corsair MP700 PRO 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: EQFM22.1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 6,102
Write 5,979
Mixed 3,388
1,146% 5,156 MB/s
4K Read 63.4
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 82.3
265% 88.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,697
DQ Write 825
DQ Mixed 1,485
1,043% 1,336 MB/s
Poor: 460% Great: 828%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 186
Write 171
Mixed 85.5
109% 147 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1.6
1,287% 9.7 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 196
Write 165
Mixed 81.5
108% 147 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1.7
1,204% 8.97 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF564C32-48 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
256% Outstanding
MC Read 157
MC Write 64
MC Mixed 78.7
285% 99.8 GB/s
SC Read 49.5
SC Write 73.8
SC Mixed 54.1
169% 59.1 GB/s
Latency 83.2
48% 83.2 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 256%
Great: 256%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 44 9 144 42.5" 2560 1369 AUS43A0 ROG XG43UQ
Typical GamingPC Builds (Compare 248 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 188%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 127%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 247%
UFO

System: Cyberpowerpc GamingPC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $889
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback