Today's hottest deals

HP Z6 G5 Workstation Desktop PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics79.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive406% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemHP Z6 G5 Workstation Desktop PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8961
Memory115.9 GB free of 128 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230606
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 30 '24 at 19:51
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon w9-3475X
CPU0, 1 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Memory 75.3
1-Core 90.2
2-Core 178
66% 114 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 736
64% 547 Pts
64-Core 4,322
268% 4,322 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
79.3% Very good
Lighting 97.6
Reflection 110
Parallax 99.8
80% 102 fps
MRender 94.7
Gravity 95.8
Splatting 97.6
79% 96 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair MP600 PRO XT 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIFM80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3743 3991 4069 4177 4159 4196 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
406% Outstanding
Read 1,332
Write 1,182
Mixed 2,698
SusWrite 4,056
529% 2,317 MB/s
4K Read 40.9
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 69.7
211% 74.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,021
DQ Write 721
DQ Mixed 1,046
734% 929 MB/s
Poor: 279%
This bench: 406%
Great: 611%
Samsung 870 QVO 8TB-$570
1.5TB free
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 469 160 162 159 156 162 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Read 458
Write 443
Mixed 399
SusWrite 211
85% 378 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 74.5
4K Mixed 37.4
124% 45.4 MB/s
DQ Read 348
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 339
253% 336 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 129%
Corsair MP600 PRO XT 8TB
7TB free
Firmware: EIFM51.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3600 3682 3744 3797 3780 3803 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
316% Outstanding
Read 570
Write 82
Mixed 464
SusWrite 3,734
278% 1,213 MB/s
4K Read 7.9
4K Write 9.4
4K Mixed 39.6
68% 19 MB/s
DQ Read 964
DQ Write 917
DQ Mixed 1,148
805% 1,010 MB/s
Poor: 295%
This bench: 316%
Great: 582%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMCG88MEBRA115N HMCG88MEBRA115N Micron MTC20F2085S1RC48BA1 HMCG88MEBRA115N 127GB
4800, 4800, 4800, 4800 MHz
32767, 32767, 32767, 32767 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
122% Outstanding
MC Read 67.6
MC Write 40.8
MC Mixed 39.4
141% 49.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 14.9
44% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 85.8
47% 85.8 ns
Poor: 100%
This bench: 122%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 31.5" 1280 720 GBT3204 Gigabyte M32U
Typical Z6 G5 Workstation Desktop PC Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 180%
UFO

System: HP Z6 G5 Workstation Desktop PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $139
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $72
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback