Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 24385JU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 24385JU  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 24385JU
Memory10 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190909
Uptime11.2 Days
Run DateJul 06 '24 at 19:57
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3740QM-$220
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
64.9% Good
Memory 71.9
1-Core 92.2
2-Core 184
66% 116 Pts
4-Core 318
8-Core 419
47% 369 Pts
64-Core 412
26% 412 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Legend(17AA 21F5) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.74% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 2.3
Parallax 3.2
4% 3.37 fps
MRender 5.1
Gravity 2.7
Splatting 5.5
4% 4.43 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.74%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
MV240GB 256GB
200GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1216B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 408 412 412 392 395 288 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
78.7% Very good
Read 451
Write 383
Mixed 369
SusWrite 384
89% 397 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 60.8
4K Mixed 19.8
90% 33.9 MB/s
DQ Read 136
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 37.5
84% 167 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 7F94 SH564568FH8NWPHSFG Samsung M471B1G73BH0-CK0 14GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35.4% Below average
MC Read 12.5
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 11
34% 11.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 12.4
SC Mixed 11.6
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 96.3
42% 96.3 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 37%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 62 51 60 15.5" 1280 720 LEN40B2
Typical 24385JU Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 24385JU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $220
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $72
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback