Today's hottest deals

Micro V3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics37.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro V3  (all builds)
MotherboardShenzhen HPPAC
Memory6.1 GB free of 16 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240520
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 09 '24 at 03:28
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
97.8% Outstanding
Memory 60
1-Core 190
2-Core 377
106% 209 Pts
4-Core 725
8-Core 1,124
114% 925 Pts
64-Core 1,419
88% 1,419 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 780M Graphics
Device(1F4C E001) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 24.2.1
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
37.1% Below average
Lighting 41.2
Reflection 24.2
Parallax 66.8
34% 44.1 fps
MRender 24.2
Gravity 53.3
Splatting 73.4
44% 50.3 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 54%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0 1TB
911GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ELFK0S.6
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,663
Write 1,976
Mixed 1,678
397% 1,772 MB/s
4K Read 39.3
4K Write 83.7
4K Mixed 55.5
175% 59.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,180
DQ Write 388
DQ Mixed 919
643% 829 MB/s
Poor: 195% Great: 415%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT62F1G32D2DS-026 WT 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
120% Outstanding
MC Read 41.2
MC Write 48.5
MC Mixed 42.2
126% 44 GB/s
SC Read 28.6
SC Write 46.7
SC Mixed 40.5
110% 38.6 GB/s
Latency 130
31% 130 ns
Poor: 85%
This bench: 120%
Great: 137%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 44 9 165 14" 1280 720 BOE0B7B
Typical V3 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat

System: Micro V3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback