Today's hottest deals

Default string

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive60.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 months ago, 3 months ago.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200617
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 09 '24 at 22:43
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10610U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
70% Good
Memory 68.4
1-Core 121
2-Core 244
78% 144 Pts
4-Core 429
8-Core 328
53% 379 Pts
64-Core 387
24% 387 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 70%
Great: 80%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
M10C 256GB
189GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q1205B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 95 95 95 95 98 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
60.8% Good
Read 457
Write 382
Mixed 358
SusWrite 110
73% 327 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 60.4
4K Mixed 16.8
86% 32.8 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 290
DQ Mixed 0.5
67% 158 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 90%
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
931GB free
Firmware: P3CR013 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1330 1175 1061 464 410 498 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
210% Outstanding
Read 1,351
Write 1,372
Mixed 1,024
SusWrite 823
257% 1,142 MB/s
4K Read 53.6
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 71.9
253% 92 MB/s
DQ Read 678
DQ Write 551
DQ Mixed 274
298% 501 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 210%
Great: 295%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GSA8G4SCL156P-21 5846 DDR4 NB 8G 2400 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
55.8% Above average
MC Read 22.3
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 17.3
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 17.4
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 96.4
42% 96.4 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 50 18 32 0" 1280 720
Typical string Builds (Compare 15,332 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback