Gigabyte GA-P67A-UD5-B3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-P67A-UD5-B3  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120221
Uptime2.6 Days
Run DateJan 15 '18 at 15:16
Run Duration217 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
75% Very good
Memory 90.8
1-Core 95.4
2-Core 186
73% 124 Pts
4-Core 320
8-Core 476
50% 398 Pts
64-Core 465
29% 465 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 75%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7950-$290
Sapphire(174B 3000) 3GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.12.1
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
29.9% Poor
Lighting 38.6
Reflection 27.9
Parallax 48.3
32% 38.3 fps
MRender 26.7
Gravity 34.7
Splatting 35.4
27% 32.3 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 32%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
76GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.3% Average
Read 222
Write 155
Mixed 144
38% 174 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 32.5
4K Mixed 16.3
80% 25.6 MB/s
DQ Read 38.6
DQ Write 54.9
DQ Mixed 17.1
21% 36.9 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 108%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
57.2% Above average
Read 385
Write 241
Mixed 207
61% 278 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 40.6
4K Mixed 16
84% 28 MB/s
DQ Read 39.6
DQ Write 67.9
DQ Mixed 17.6
24% 41.7 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 108%
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
12GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
52.1% Above average
Read 296
Write 271
Mixed 237
60% 268 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 31.1
4K Mixed 16.2
73% 23.5 MB/s
DQ Read 32.7
DQ Write 53.8
DQ Mixed 18.1
21% 34.9 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 115%
Hitachi HDT725032VLA360 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
59.8% Above average
Read 104
Write 105
Mixed 24.2
56% 77.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.77
4K Write 1.99
4K Mixed 0.21
92% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 86%
Hitachi HDT725032VLA360 320GB
128GB free
Firmware: V54OA7EA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
25% Poor
Read 44.1
Write 42.7
Mixed 9.55
23% 32.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.22
69% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 25%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.3% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 14.1
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 14.6
38% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 66.1
60% 66.1 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-P67A-UD5-B3 Builds (Compare 52 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P67A-UD5-B3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $552
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback