Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X670E AORUS PRO X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 212%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 113%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 212%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 111%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics195% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive274% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X670E AORUS PRO X  (all builds)
Memory84 GB free of 96 GB
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240110
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateJul 13 '24 at 05:12
Run Duration288 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D-$535
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Memory 80.4
1-Core 197
2-Core 386
115% 221 Pts
4-Core 759
8-Core 1,167
119% 963 Pts
64-Core 1,729
107% 1,729 Pts
Poor: 104%
This bench: 111%
Great: 123%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$793
Nvidia(10DE 2216) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 556.12
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
195% Outstanding
Lighting 281
Reflection 258
Parallax 317
229% 286 fps
MRender 338
Gravity 238
Splatting 176
196% 250 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 195%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$192
143GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1976 1950 1957 1944 1568 667 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
274% Outstanding
Read 2,063
Write 2391
Mixed 1,304
SusWrite 1677
418% 1,859 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 62.1
4K Mixed 43
138% 46 MB/s
DQ Read 1,160
DQ Write 907
DQ Mixed 1076
793% 1,047 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 274%
Great: 508%
Samsung 980 PRO with Heatsink 2TB
500GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2350 2488 2474 1896 1511 1555 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
323% Outstanding
Read 2,353
Write 2,546
Mixed 2,445
SusWrite 2,046
530% 2,347 MB/s
4K Read 46.8
4K Write 59.8
4K Mixed 53.3
171% 53.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,214
DQ Write 1,058
DQ Mixed 1,153
860% 1,141 MB/s
Poor: 256%
This bench: 323%
Great: 506%
ST16000NM001G-2KK103 16TB
564GB free
Firmware: SN02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 122 129 120 125 123 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
24.3% Poor
Read 123
Write 121
Mixed 79.2
SusWrite 123
25% 112 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 12
4K Mixed 1.4
43% 12.1 MB/s
DQ Read 3.5
DQ Write 10.7
DQ Mixed 1.4
3% 5.2 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24.3%
Great: 44%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$69
964GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 82 83 82 83 81 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Read 117
Write 107
Mixed 80.5
SusWrite 82
72% 96.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CP48G56C46U5.M16B1 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
158% Outstanding
MC Read 60.7
MC Write 54
MC Mixed 58
164% 57.6 GB/s
SC Read 50
SC Write 59.9
SC Mixed 48.3
151% 52.7 GB/s
Latency 85.8
47% 85.8 ns
Poor: 158%
This bench: 158%
Great: 264%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 27" 1440 829 ACI27EC ROG PG279Q
Typical GA-X670E AORUS PRO X Builds (Compare 75 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 412%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 421%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X670E AORUS PRO X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $2,420
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $246Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback