Today's hottest deals

Geekom A5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics18.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemGeekom A5  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory21.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230726
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 16 '24 at 02:39
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Memory 69.8
1-Core 149
2-Core 304
92% 174 Pts
4-Core 584
8-Core 909
92% 746 Pts
64-Core 1,107
68% 1,107 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
AMD(1002 1636) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.5.1
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
18.2% Very poor
Lighting 23.1
Reflection 19
Parallax 31.9
19% 24.7 fps
MRender 13.4
Gravity 26.6
Splatting 21.2
17% 20.4 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Wodposit NVMe SSD 512GB
415GB free (System drive)
Firmware: APF1M3R1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,264
Write 2,122
Mixed 1509
368% 1,632 MB/s
4K Read 45.8
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 67.4
224% 80.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,107
DQ Write 745
DQ Mixed 942
699% 931 MB/s
Poor: 127% Great: 297%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown WPBH32D416SWA-16G 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.8% Very good
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 24.6
MC Mixed 24.7
73% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 21.6
SC Write 29.3
SC Mixed 24.1
71% 25 GB/s
Latency 99.5
40% 99.5 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 56 85 34.1" 1280 720 GSM7767 LG ULTRAWIDE
Typical A5 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: Geekom A5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $376WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $250Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback