Today's hottest deals

HP Laptop 14s-fq1xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.24% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive74.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP Laptop 14s-fq1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 887C
Memory8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230802
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateJul 17 '24 at 11:06
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
66.5% Good
Memory 68.2
1-Core 77.3
2-Core 141
56% 95.4 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 622
58% 485 Pts
64-Core 745
46% 745 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
HP(103C 887C) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.44
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
8.24% Terrible
Lighting 7.2
Reflection 16.3
Parallax 19.8
6% 14.4 fps
MRender 13
Gravity 15.8
Splatting 17.4
13% 15.4 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.24%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Solidigm SSDPFKNU512GZH 512GB
342GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 172 67 63 156 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Read 810
Write 482
Mixed 128
SusWrite 99.1
83% 380 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 24.2
4K Mixed 24.3
84% 25 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 81.7
DQ Mixed 120
117% 193 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 254%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown LD4AS008G-3200ST Adata AO1P32NC8T1-BBVS 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
67.6% Good
MC Read 26.4
MC Write 23.6
MC Mixed 23.4
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 25.4
SC Mixed 18.4
58% 20.2 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 53 60 13.9" 1280 720 CMN142A
Typical Laptop 14s-fq1xxx Builds (Compare 444 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 14s-fq1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback