Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 21M5CTO1WW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics19.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive409% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 21M5CTO1WW  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 21M5CTO1WW
Memory7.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240604
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 19 '24 at 23:22
Run Duration219 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Memory 69.1
1-Core 170
2-Core 309
96% 182 Pts
4-Core 504
8-Core 790
80% 647 Pts
64-Core 861
53% 861 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Legend(17AA 50EC) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 23.20.44.03
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
19.2% Very poor
Lighting 24.6
Reflection 33.8
Parallax 33.1
20% 30.5 fps
MRender 21.8
Gravity 22.6
Splatting 20.1
18% 21.5 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZAL81T0HDLB-00BLL 1TB
912GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5L2QKXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2547 2685 2592 3354 3442 3418 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
409% Outstanding
Read 2,507
Write 3,589
Mixed 2,820
SusWrite 3,006
676% 2,981 MB/s
4K Read 60.8
4K Write 162
4K Mixed 89.8
293% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,014
DQ Write 521
DQ Mixed 808
589% 781 MB/s
Poor: 113%
This bench: 409%
Great: 457%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 32GB
24GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 179
Write 25.4
Mixed 2.5
54% 69 MB/s
4K Read 9.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
36% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R1GB4PB0-CWMOD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
99.1% Outstanding
MC Read 32.4
MC Write 42.1
MC Mixed 36.6
106% 37 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 39.7
SC Mixed 23.4
76% 26.6 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 99%
This bench: 99.1%
Great: 152%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 43 7 60 16" 1707 996 LEN41B0
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $376WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $250Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback