Today's hottest deals

Toshiba SATELLITE C55D-A-14M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 22%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemToshiba SATELLITE C55D-A-14M  (all builds)
MotherboardAMD PT10AN
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130830
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJul 26 '24 at 11:57
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 50%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E1-2100 APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1 GHz, turbo 1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
20.7% Poor
Memory 37.8
1-Core 13.1
2-Core 22.7
18% 24.5 Pts
4-Core 23.4
8-Core 24.6
3% 24 Pts
64-Core 24
2% 24 Pts
Poor: 6%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 26%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 8210
Toshiba(1179 FA33) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
0.97% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 1.5
1% 1.63 fps
MRender 2.2
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 2.1
1% 1.5 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.97%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Twinmos SSD 256GB
215GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H210909a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 282 269 262 255 272 264 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
44.8% Average
Read 291
Write 286
Mixed 284
SusWrite 267
64% 282 MB/s
4K Read 13.5
4K Write 15
4K Mixed 14.6
47% 14.4 MB/s
DQ Read 50.9
DQ Write 44.7
DQ Mixed 48.1
36% 47.9 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 237%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT451S6DFR8A-PB Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
9.31% Terrible
MC Read 3.2
MC Write 2.7
MC Mixed 3
8% 2.97 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 2.9
SC Mixed 4
10% 3.4 GB/s
Latency 299
13% 299 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.31%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 43 23 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO22EC
Typical SATELLITE C55D-A-14M Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 20%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE C55D-A-14M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback