Today's hottest deals

Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F17 FX707ZM_FX777ZM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics96.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming F17 FX707ZM_FX777ZM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX707ZM
Memory27.9 GB free of 40 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230503
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 26 '24 at 14:27
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
70.8% Very good
Memory 52.9
1-Core 167
2-Core 270
86% 163 Pts
4-Core 475
8-Core 716
74% 596 Pts
64-Core 1,135
70% 1,135 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 102%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Asus(1043 1D3C) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4502
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Lighting 9.5
Reflection 27.1
Parallax 26.7
8% 21.1 fps
MRender 26.5
Gravity 34.3
Splatting 22
22% 27.6 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 21%
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
Asus(1043 1D3C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3550 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 560.70
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
96.7% Outstanding
Lighting 126
Reflection 126
Parallax 119
102% 124 fps
MRender 144
Gravity 93.7
Splatting 86.8
86% 108 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 96.7%
Great: 105%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLQ1T0HBLB-00B00 1TB
110GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7301Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,452
Write 1,655
Mixed 1,381
335% 1,496 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 66.1
214% 79.5 MB/s
DQ Read 949
DQ Write 748
DQ Mixed 723
575% 807 MB/s
Poor: 119% Great: 289%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT32G56C46S5.C16D Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOD 39GB
5600, 4800 MHz
32767, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
54.1% Above average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 22.9
MC Mixed 20.8
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 10.8
34% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 173
23% 173 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 64 47 60 17.3" 1280 720 AUO4B9D
Typical ASUS TUF Gaming F17 FX707ZM_FX777ZM Builds (Compare 36 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F17 FX707ZM_FX777ZM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback