Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics90.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive147% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200428
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateAug 03 '24 at 16:52
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$60
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
66.6% Good
Memory 64.6
1-Core 99.7
2-Core 214
68% 126 Pts
4-Core 397
8-Core 390
53% 393 Pts
64-Core 383
24% 383 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$270
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 556.12
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
90.6% Outstanding
Lighting 108
Reflection 102
Parallax 121
88% 110 fps
MRender 159
Gravity 104
Splatting 97.5
96% 120 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 106%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
COCONUT 256GB
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1103L0L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 742 343 302 424 311 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
147% Outstanding
Read 1,494
Write 1,149
Mixed 913
SusWrite 388
219% 986 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 24.6
144% 56.7 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 614
DQ Mixed 354
308% 448 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 147%
Great: 147%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CB8GU2666.C8RT 16GB
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
75.6% Very good
MC Read 28.7
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 26.9
79% 27.5 GB/s
SC Read 19.2
SC Write 27.8
SC Mixed 22.3
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 144 23.8" 1920 1017 ACR0750 VG240Y S
Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,985 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $425
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback