Today's hottest deals

N/A N/A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive96.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemN/A N/A  (all builds)
MotherboardN/A N/A
Memory4.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231127
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateAug 05 '24 at 00:14
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
48.3% Average
Memory 39.4
1-Core 89.8
2-Core 180
54% 103 Pts
4-Core 306
8-Core 507
50% 407 Pts
64-Core 772
48% 772 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Device(1E50 8015) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 30.0.13016.3
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
6.5% Terrible
Lighting 7.3
Reflection 7.9
Parallax 16.1
6% 10.4 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 11.8
Splatting 11.6
8% 8.77 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 6.5%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Shiji 512GB M.2-NVMe 512GB
430GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1013A3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 522 569 618 729 639 592 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
96.8% Outstanding
Read 445
Write 368
Mixed 350
SusWrite 611
100% 444 MB/s
4K Read 8.6
4K Write 35.4
4K Mixed 10.6
45% 18.2 MB/s
DQ Read 735
DQ Write 537
DQ Mixed 436
380% 570 MB/s
Poor: 125%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 244%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GHT16G2666-NB 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28% Poor
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 10.6
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 4.7
SC Write 7.1
SC Mixed 4.9
16% 5.57 GB/s
Latency 265
15% 265 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 34 13 165 15.5" 1280 720 BOE0B68 NE156QHM-NY1
Typical N/A Builds (Compare 56 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: N/A N/A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $123
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $250Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback