Today's hottest deals

Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1504ZA_X1504ZA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics10.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive334% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1504ZA_X1504ZA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X1504ZA
Memory10.3 GB free of 20 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230921
Uptime5.9 Days
Run DateAug 07 '24 at 19:14
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1235U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Memory 72.5
1-Core 164
2-Core 322
98% 186 Pts
4-Core 500
8-Core 735
77% 617 Pts
64-Core 813
50% 813 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Asus(1043 286D) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4255
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Lighting 13.6
Reflection 18.3
Parallax 17.1
11% 16.3 fps
MRender 0.1
Gravity 18.8
Splatting 13.4
9% 10.8 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS512GEJ9X108N 512GB
363GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51002C30
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2174 2617 2748 2967 1163 1139 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
334% Outstanding
Read 1,903
Write 3334
Mixed 1,992
SusWrite 2,135
531% 2341 MB/s
4K Read 67.8
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 47.1
233% 82.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,559
DQ Write 1,076
DQ Mixed 1,287
969% 1,307 MB/s
Poor: 154%
This bench: 334%
Great: 334%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE Adata 20GB
3200, 3200 MHz
4096, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
55.9% Above average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 19.3
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 21.3
SC Mixed 19.4
55% 19.2 GB/s
Latency 96.8
41% 96.8 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 1: 0P 0R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
1% 100% 1 75 2 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO05A7
Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1504ZA_X1504ZA Builds (Compare 162 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1504ZA_X1504ZA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback