Today's hottest deals

HP EliteBook 2570p

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteBook 2570p  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 17DF
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190412
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateAug 13 '24 at 12:47
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3230M-$100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Memory 77.2
1-Core 80.1
2-Core 127
58% 94.8 Pts
4-Core 195
8-Core 194
26% 194 Pts
64-Core 193
12% 193 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
HP(103C 17DF) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.02% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 2.7
3% 2.77 fps
MRender 4.3
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 4.4
3% 3.63 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.02%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M4 128GB-$116
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 070H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 102 96 83 76 71 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 422
Write 188
Mixed 221
SusWrite 92.1
51% 231 MB/s
4K Read 17.8
4K Write 41.2
4K Mixed 13.4
66% 24.1 MB/s
DQ Read 126
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 29.7
46% 88.5 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot PSD3L1600C118G2VS 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.4% Average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 14
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 13.6
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 84.1
48% 84.1 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 63 52 60 12.5" 1280 720 AUO206C
Typical EliteBook 2570p Builds (Compare 470 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 2570p

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback