Today's hottest deals

Acer Predator PHN16-72

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics115% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Predator PHN16-72  (all builds)
MotherboardRPL EQE_RTX
Memory6.9 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240423
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateAug 14 '24 at 16:32
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-14500HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
71.4% Very good
Memory 64.4
1-Core 197
2-Core 374
108% 212 Pts
4-Core 418
8-Core 966
80% 692 Pts
64-Core 1,995
123% 1,995 Pts
Poor: 77%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4050 (Laptop)
Acer(1025 1731) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.5227
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Lighting 158
Reflection 103
Parallax 125
129% 129 fps
MRender 183
Gravity 104
Splatting 88.9
98% 125 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 115%
Great: 113%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme HFS001TEJ9X125N 1TB
607GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51022A20 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,248
Write 841
Mixed 998
297% 1,362 MB/s
4K Read 57.8
4K Write 216
4K Mixed 81.8
307% 119 MB/s
DQ Read 1,263
DQ Write 928
DQ Mixed 694
627% 961 MB/s
Poor: 325% Great: 582%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R1GB4PB0-CWMOD Adata AD5S48008G-B 16GB
5600, 4800 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
131% Outstanding
MC Read 57.9
MC Write 46.1
MC Mixed 48.7
145% 50.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.9
SC Write 41.7
SC Mixed 26
82% 28.9 GB/s
Latency 128
31% 128 ns
Poor: 116%
This bench: 131%
Great: 131%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 56 27 165 16" 1280 720 BOE0B72
Typical Predator PHN16-72 Builds (Compare 55 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: Acer Predator PHN16-72

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback