HP EliteDesk 705 G1 DM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP EliteDesk 705 G1 DM  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 225E
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170207
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 16 '18 at 21:44
Run Duration94 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8 PRO-7600B R7, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6G
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
44.1% Average
Memory 66.3
1-Core 46.3
2-Core 75.6
41% 62.7 Pts
4-Core 130
8-Core 130
17% 130 Pts
64-Core 134
8% 134 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7
HP(103C 225E) 128MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1101.1001
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
2.97% Terrible
Lighting 3.3
Reflection 5.42
Parallax 4.28
3% 4.33 fps
MRender 4.05
Gravity 3.87
Splatting 4.74
4% 4.22 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.97%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST500LM021-1KJ152 500GB
396GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0002YXM1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Read 124
Write 129
Mixed 120
94% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.84
4K Mixed 0.07
61% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata V01L3SF8GB52852816 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.3% Below average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 8.1
MC Mixed 14.3
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 8.5
20% 6.93 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 705 G1 DM Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 705 G1 DM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback