Asus P8H61-M LX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics0.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 5GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8H61-M LX  (all builds)
Memory3.1 GB free of 5 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110526
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 16 '18 at 21:48
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2320-$165
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
70.3% Very good
Memory 85.6
1-Core 84.6
2-Core 167
67% 112 Pts
4-Core 320
8-Core 313
42% 317 Pts
64-Core 320
20% 320 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 7350
PowerColor(148C 7350) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.96% Terrible
Lighting 1.2
Reflection 1.35
Parallax 1.5
1% 1.35 fps
MRender 1.38
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 1.22
1% 1.13 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.96%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
171GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
56% Above average
Read 265
Write 212
Mixed 219
52% 232 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 43.8
4K Mixed 20.2
95% 31.4 MB/s
DQ Read 35.2
DQ Write 151
DQ Mixed 17.4
35% 67.8 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 56%
Great: 124%
WD Green 1.5TB (2011)-$51
1TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
35.1% Below average
Read 66.7
Write 55.4
Mixed 53.8
44% 58.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.74
4K Mixed 0.17
76% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend JM1333KLU-1G 5GB
1333, 1333 MHz
1024, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41% Average
MC Read 15
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 11
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 11.8
36% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 71.5
56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 41%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H61-M LX Builds (Compare 1,428 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M LX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $77
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback