Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 83AC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics28.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive356% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 83AC  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory7.7 GB free of 16 GB
Display2880 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240222
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateAug 22 '24 at 20:13
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 22 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
98.5% Outstanding
Memory 54.9
1-Core 188
2-Core 381
104% 208 Pts
4-Core 759
8-Core 1,183
120% 971 Pts
64-Core 1353
84% 1353 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Arc Graphics X8 (H-iGPU)
Legend(17AA 3D27) 128MB
Driver: igd9trinity64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.5540
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.9% Poor
Lighting 32.8
Reflection 25.1
Parallax 65.9
27% 41.3 fps
MRender 28.2
Gravity 41.5
Splatting 47.7
33% 39.1 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 38%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZAL81T0HDLB-00BL2 1TB
877GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5L1QKXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2292 2245 2096 2885 2846 1854 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
356% Outstanding
Read 2,335
Write 2,458
Mixed 2,128
SusWrite 2,370
524% 2,323 MB/s
4K Read 57.2
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 72.6
238% 80 MB/s
DQ Read 904
DQ Write 1,089
DQ Mixed 995
750% 996 MB/s
Poor: 190%
This bench: 356%
Great: 400%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT62F1G32D2DS-026 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h clocked @ 7467 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
166% Outstanding
MC Read 67.1
MC Write 55.9
MC Mixed 75.6
189% 66.2 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 37.8
SC Mixed 32.4
86% 30.2 GB/s
Latency 142
28% 142 ns
Poor: 115%
This bench: 166%
Great: 166%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 6: 0P 0R 1G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
6% 10% 39 142 56 120 14" 1440 877 LEN8ABA
Typical 83AC Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

System: Lenovo 83AC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback