Today's hottest deals

LG 17Z90S-H.ADB9U1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (3rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 97 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics9.86% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLG 17Z90S-H.ADB9U1  (all builds)
MotherboardLG 17Z90S
Memory19.9 GB free of 32 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240304
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 22 '24 at 22:38
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 22 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
37% Below average
Memory 36.2
1-Core 78.9
2-Core 162
48% 92.3 Pts
4-Core 203
8-Core 386
35% 295 Pts
64-Core 496
31% 496 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 37%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Arc Graphics X8 (H-iGPU)
Device(1854 051D) 128MB
Driver: igd9trinity64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.5382
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
9.86% Terrible
Lighting 11.4
Reflection 11.9
Parallax 24.4
9% 15.9 fps
MRender 13.8
Gravity 11.7
Splatting 14.3
11% 13.3 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 9.86%
Great: 38%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS001TEJ9X108N 1TB
843GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51002C30
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1028
Write 802
Mixed 840
198% 890 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 38.9
4K Mixed 22.3
96% 30.7 MB/s
DQ Read 194
DQ Write 85.8
DQ Mixed 202
133% 160 MB/s
Poor: 118% Great: 330%
HFS001TEJ9X108N 1TB
954GB free
Firmware: 51002C30
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,022
Write 848
Mixed 822
200% 897 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 35.2
4K Mixed 22.2
94% 29.5 MB/s
DQ Read 181
DQ Write 69.7
DQ Mixed 146
102% 132 MB/s
Poor: 118% Great: 330%
Samsung Flash Drive FIT 257GB
17GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 328
Write 104
Mixed 68.4
165% 167 MB/s
4K Read 10
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.6
71% 3.67 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H58G66BK7BX067 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB Row of chips 23h 8533 MHz clocked @ 7467 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
104% Outstanding
MC Read 33.9
MC Write 55.2
MC Mixed 36.9
120% 42 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 20.6
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 195
20% 195 ns
Poor: 104%
This bench: 104%
Great: 168%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 60 45 60 17" 1280 720 LGD06EA
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback