Today's hottest deals

Mousecomputer NS70PU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
SystemMousecomputer NS70PU  (all builds)
MotherboardMouseComputer NS70PU
Memory50.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220906
Uptime12.6 Days
Run DateAug 28 '24 at 11:00
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1260P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 0.9 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
20.5% Poor
Memory 22.4
1-Core 130
2-Core 53.8
43% 68.6 Pts
4-Core 110
8-Core 98.2
14% 104 Pts
64-Core 219
14% 219 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Clevo(1558 7716) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3358
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.64% Terrible
Lighting 2.8
Reflection 4.9
Parallax 4.1
2% 3.93 fps
MRender 5.3
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 0.9
3% 4.5 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 2.64%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme INTEL SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GB
244GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 104 178 68 29 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
70.1% Very good
Read 839
Write 450
Mixed 696
SusWrite 86.8
115% 518 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 22.4
4K Mixed 29.4
87% 25.4 MB/s
DQ Read 123
DQ Write 41.7
DQ Mixed 73
56% 79.2 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 297%
Nvme INTEL SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GB
464GB free
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 203 196 226 194 202 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
63.9% Good
Read 657
Write 265
Mixed 297
SusWrite 204
78% 356 MB/s
4K Read 10.8
4K Write 18.6
4K Mixed 28.8
63% 19.4 MB/s
DQ Read 133
DQ Write 42.4
DQ Mixed 70.8
57% 82.2 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 297%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston CBD32D4S2D8MF-32 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
45.1% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 17.5
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 13.3
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 180
22% 180 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 103 59 40 17.3" 1280 720 BOE084E
Typical NS70PU Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: Mousecomputer NS70PU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback