Today's hottest deals

Supermicro X9SRA/X9SRA-3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSupermicro X9SRA/X9SRA-3  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X9SRA/X9SRA-3
Memory29.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150116
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 29 '24 at 08:42
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2-$635
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
77.2% Very good
Memory 84
1-Core 93.8
2-Core 190
71% 123 Pts
4-Core 379
8-Core 618
61% 498 Pts
64-Core 730
45% 730 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
EVGA(3842 2710) 1GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.49% Terrible
Lighting 4.2
Reflection 4.2
Parallax 4.4
3% 4.27 fps
MRender 4.1
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5
4% 4.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.49%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel X25-M 80GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2CV102HD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 80 76 83 81 78 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
38.1% Below average
Read 252
Write 83.1
Mixed 114
SusWrite 79.8
29% 132 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 31.2
4K Mixed 10.8
62% 20.9 MB/s
DQ Read 149
DQ Write 79
DQ Mixed 79.9
68% 103 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965439-127.A00LF 9965439-093.A00LF 9965439-127.A00LF 9965439-093.A00LF 9965439-127.A00LF 9965439-093.A00LF 9965439-127.A00LF 9965439-093.A00LF 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
98.6% Outstanding
MC Read 40.8
MC Write 39.2
MC Mixed 37.3
112% 39.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 12.3
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 72.4
55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 98%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 144 23.8" 1280 720 GBT2402 GIGABYTE G24F
Typical X9SRA/X9SRA-3 Builds (Compare 100 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

System: Supermicro X9SRA/X9SRA-3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $694
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback