| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 2.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Micro-Star MS-7C51 |
| Motherboard | MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51) (all builds) |
| Memory | 7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20201208 |
| Uptime | 3.1 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 05 '24 at 17:22 |
| Run Duration | 168 Seconds |
| Run User | FRA-User |
| Background CPU | 36% |
PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
63.3%
Good
|
70% 130 Pts
|
51% 380 Pts
|
26% 421 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
MSI(1462 7C51) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
|
2.14%
Terrible
|
0% 7.4 fps
|
6% 7.2 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SSD_2.5"_TLC_256GB_InnovationIT 256GB
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1125A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.6 5.7 14 11 6.7 4.9 MB/s
|
||||
|
Toshiba P300 1TB-$79
108GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 120 112 99 115 109 MB/s
|
73.8%
Very good
|
81% 112 MB/s
|
156% 1.13 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown INNO16G30002GS 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
17.7%
Very poor
|
17% 6.03 GB/s
|
15% 5.37 GB/s
|
21% 190 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
| Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | 0% | 0 | 19 | 1 | 60 | 23.8" | 1280 720 | HKC2496 24E4 |
Typical A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51) Builds (Compare 4,041 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $120Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 560x |
| Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $60Bench 63%, 104,122 samples | 503x |
| Ryzen 5 3600AMD $88Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples | 414x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1650Nvidia $152Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 327x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 240x |
| GTX 1660Nvidia $209Bench 68%, 230,793 samples | 237x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 78% - Very good | Total price: $272 |