Today's hottest deals

Dream NP5x_6x_7x_SNx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics153% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemDream NP5x_6x_7x_SNx  (all builds)
MotherboardDREAM NP5x_6x_7x_SNx
Memory22 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231124
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateSep 08 '24 at 08:06
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-14900HX
U29, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
63.4% Good
Memory 74
1-Core 139
2-Core 193
78% 135 Pts
4-Core 296
8-Core 352
42% 324 Pts
64-Core 369
23% 369 Pts
Poor: 111%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 122%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Clevo(1558 A650) 128MB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.5333
Relative performance (0th percentile)
4.37% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 8.1
Parallax 6.7
4% 6.47 fps
MRender 7.9
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 5.7
6% 6.97 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 4.37%
Great: 10%
Nvidia RTX 4070 (Laptop)
Clevo(1558 A673) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 560.94
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
153% Outstanding
Lighting 209
Reflection 191
Parallax 215
171% 205 fps
MRender 307
Gravity 179
Splatting 126
158% 204 fps
Poor: 96%
This bench: 153%
Great: 154%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 1TB
620GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VC2S038E Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,469
Write 1,229
Mixed 944
269% 1,214 MB/s
4K Read 42.7
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 61.7
206% 73.9 MB/s
DQ Read 742
DQ Write 417
DQ Mixed 520
403% 560 MB/s
Poor: 145% Great: 320%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot Memory (PDP Systems) PSD516G480081S 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
71.2% Very good
MC Read 20
MC Write 31.9
MC Mixed 24.9
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 28.6
SC Mixed 21.3
62% 21.5 GB/s
Latency 92.3
43% 92.3 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 151%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 116 47 60 17.3" 1280 720 BOE09EE
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback