Today's hottest deals

Fujitsu CELSIUS W550power

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics69.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive214% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS W550power  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3417-A2
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170515
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateSep 27 '24 at 03:01
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1275 v5
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Memory 90.3
1-Core 110
2-Core 217
80% 139 Pts
4-Core 397
8-Core 608
62% 503 Pts
64-Core 610
38% 610 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$225
MSI(1462 8D94) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 560.94
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
69.9% Good
Lighting 88.5
Reflection 124
Parallax 81.2
72% 97.8 fps
MRender 103
Gravity 75.2
Splatting 68.1
66% 82.2 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 76%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNVS500G 500GB
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFK0N01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1426 564 553 545 529 576 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
214% Outstanding
Read 1,325
Write 1,733
Mixed 1,316
SusWrite 699
286% 1,268 MB/s
4K Read 49.9
4K Write 156
4K Mixed 73
252% 93 MB/s
DQ Read 1,169
DQ Write 640
DQ Mixed 872
657% 894 MB/s
Poor: 108%
This bench: 214%
Great: 244%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M391A1K43DB2-CWE Hynix HMA81GU7DJR8N-XN 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
69.4% Good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 26.5
MC Mixed 20.6
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 25.3
SC Mixed 19.8
58% 20.2 GB/s
Latency 66.7
60% 66.7 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 45 10 180 24.5" 1920 1017 AUS2589 VG259Q3A
Typical CELSIUS W550power Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS W550power

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $225
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback