Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 56% Gunboat	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	58.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1275 v5 368 User benchmarks, average bench 78% CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	58.6% Above average	Memory 42.9 1-Core 121 2-Core 235 68% 133 Pts	4-Core 397 8-Core 625 63% 511 Pts	64-Core 658 41% 658 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 58.6% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD P530 (Server Skylake) 5,499 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Intel(8086 191D) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4501 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	1.59% Terrible	Lighting 0.9 Reflection 2.27 Parallax 1.75 1% 1.64 fps	MRender 3.24 Gravity 6.93 Splatting 2.3 3% 4.16 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 1.59% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel Raid 1 Volume 114GB 47 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 10GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0. Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	58.1% Above average	Read 689 Write 119 Mixed 183 71% 330 MB/s	4K Read 24.4 4K Write 62.5 4K Mixed 3.78 75% 30.2 MB/s	DQ Read 38.8 DQ Write 87.8 DQ Mixed 22 29% 49.6 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 58.1% Great: 89%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9965669-008.A03G 2x16GB 76 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	72.3% Very good	MC Read 27.2 MC Write 28.2 MC Mixed 24 76% 26.5 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 29.2 SC Mixed 23.2 66% 23.2 GB/s	Latency 189 21% 189 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 72.3% Great: 77%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 118%

UFO

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 99%

Nuclear submarine

SSD
CS900 1TB SSDPNYBench 78%, 7,281 samples	7x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $85Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	3x
SSDPEKKW010T8 1TBIntelBench 248%, 3,058 samples	3x

RAM
Aegis DDR4 2133 C15 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 68%, 5,199 samples	18x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	3x
M391A2K43BB1-CPB 2x16GBSamsungBench 73%, 178 samples	2x

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $660