Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-A620M S2H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics60.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive39.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A620M S2H  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240814
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 28 '24 at 14:32
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7700-$269
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 77.2
1-Core 203
2-Core 378
114% 219 Pts
4-Core 717
8-Core 1,411
126% 1,064 Pts
64-Core 1,773
110% 1,773 Pts
Poor: 98%
This bench: 106%
Great: 120%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7600
Sapphire(1DA2 E452) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.8.1
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
60.6% Good
Lighting 0.3
Reflection 196
Parallax 294
0% 164 fps
MRender 240
Gravity 189
Splatting 223
178% 217 fps
Poor: 61%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 138%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 1TB SSD
196GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS9006B5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 114 113 113 114 152 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
39.1% Below average
Read 354
Write 102
Mixed 91.9
SusWrite 138
38% 171 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 20.5
4K Mixed 10.7
54% 16.8 MB/s
DQ Read 13.7
DQ Write 15.4
DQ Mixed 15.3
11% 14.8 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AD5U56008G-B 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
125% Outstanding
MC Read 47.9
MC Write 38.5
MC Mixed 42.3
123% 42.9 GB/s
SC Read 45.6
SC Write 57.9
SC Mixed 50.9
147% 51.5 GB/s
Latency 84.5
47% 84.5 ns
Poor: 111%
This bench: 125%
Great: 153%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 8: 0P 1R 1G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
8% 14% 14 187 12 60 27" 1920 1009 ACR0AF1 KG272 E
Typical GA-A620M S2H Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 192%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 182%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A620M S2H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $580
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback