Today's hottest deals

Machenike L16A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics15.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive134% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
10 days ago, 9 days ago.
SystemMachenike L16A  (all builds)
MotherboardMachenike L16A-RPL
Memory8.4 GB free of 16 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240116
Uptime7.7 Days
Run DateOct 01 '24 at 09:13
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13620H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Memory 43.5
1-Core 126
2-Core 255
72% 142 Pts
4-Core 404
8-Core 734
68% 569 Pts
64-Core 1,236
76% 1,236 Pts
Poor: 93%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 109%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(200D 1019) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4953
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Lighting 17.9
Reflection 24.6
Parallax 19.3
15% 20.6 fps
MRender 22.3
Gravity 25.9
Splatting 17.9
18% 22 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SCY S5000 512G 512GB
351GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.F.G.39
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1436 1028 1127 600 831 842 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
134% Outstanding
Read 585
Write 772
Mixed 502
SusWrite 977
161% 709 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 85.5
4K Mixed 15.2
102% 41.7 MB/s
DQ Read 693
DQ Write 269
DQ Mixed 309
274% 424 MB/s
Poor: 134%
This bench: 134%
Great: 327%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron ( ( 26DF321 25DF081A COMMONVID 25VF016 25L25635E | Te... 16GB
7400, 7400, 7400, 7400, 7400, 7400, 7400, 7400 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
136% Outstanding
MC Read 53.6
MC Write 60.6
MC Mixed 51.1
157% 55.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 28.4
SC Mixed 20.5
60% 20.9 GB/s
Latency 179
22% 179 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 120 16" 1280 720 BOE0AC1
Typical L16A Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

System: Machenike L16A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback