Today's hottest deals

HP EliteBook 640 14 inch G11 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP EliteBook 640 14 inch G11 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8C86
Memory21.5 GB free of 32 GB
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240820
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 09 '24 at 15:57
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core Ultra 7 165U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 14 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
64% Good
Memory 37.8
1-Core 119
2-Core 297
73% 151 Pts
4-Core 481
8-Core 778
77% 630 Pts
64-Core 889
55% 889 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 64%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Graphics X4 (U-iGPU)
HP(103C 8C86) 128MB
Driver: igd9trinity64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.5333
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Lighting 15.6
Reflection 11.4
Parallax 30.5
13% 19.2 fps
MRender 14.3
Gravity 20.3
Splatting 29.3
18% 21.3 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL21T0HCLR-00BH1 1TB
667GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS4NGXH
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,634
Write 1,051
Mixed 827
258% 1,170 MB/s
4K Read 48.2
4K Write 23.1
4K Mixed 32.3
127% 34.5 MB/s
DQ Read 476
DQ Write 153
DQ Mixed 348
248% 326 MB/s
Poor: 159% Great: 431%
Seagate Expansion HDD 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1901
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 97.5
Write 119
Mixed 81.6
74% 99.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1 MB/s
Poor: 18% Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MTC16C2085S1SC56BD1 1x31GB
1 of 2 slots used
31GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
MC Read 35.5
MC Write 33.9
MC Mixed 33.5
98% 34.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 27.6
SC Mixed 21.9
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 187
21% 187 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 54 60 14" 1280 720 BOE0C30
Typical EliteBook 640 14 inch G11 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: HP EliteBook 640 14 inch G11 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback