Today's hottest deals

HP Elite SFF 805 G9 Desktop PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics45.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP Elite SFF 805 G9 Desktop PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8D0A
Memory8.4 GB free of 16 GB
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240814
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateNov 21 '24 at 05:22
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G-$279
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
Memory 46.6
1-Core 200
2-Core 398
106% 215 Pts
4-Core 783
8-Core 1,536
137% 1,159 Pts
64-Core 1,799
111% 1,799 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 780M
HP(103C 8D0A) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 24.10.34
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45.8% Average
Lighting 50.3
Reflection 10.3
Parallax 63
41% 41.2 fps
MRender 9.9
Gravity 74.2
Splatting 101
55% 61.6 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 54%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDKBA512TGD-1BK1AABHA 512GB
260GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS0050
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,516
Write 2,839
Mixed 2,420
649% 2,925 MB/s
4K Read 60.5
4K Write 74.6
4K Mixed 56.2
203% 63.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,037
DQ Write 366
DQ Mixed 533
438% 645 MB/s
Poor: 203% Great: 383%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M323R2GA3PB0-CWMOL 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
59.9% Above average
MC Read 31.4
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 25.9
66% 23.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 9.7
SC Mixed 16
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 174
23% 174 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 54 60 27.9" 1280 720 ACI28A7 ASUS MG28U
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $284WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback