Today's hottest deals

Samsung 350V5(C|X) 350V4(C|X) 351V5(C|X) 351V4(C|X) 3540V(C|X)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive96.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung 350V5(C|X) 350V4(C|X) 351V5(C|X) 351V4(C|X) 3540V(C|X)  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP350V5C-S06PL
Memory8.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120630
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJan 22 '18 at 20:37
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Memory 83.8
1-Core 82.5
2-Core 142
63% 103 Pts
4-Core 198
8-Core 200
27% 199 Pts
64-Core 191
12% 191 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0D8) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.951.9.3000
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
4.86% Terrible
Lighting 5.87
Reflection 5.96
Parallax 4.97
5% 5.6 fps
MRender 6.29
Gravity 4.77
Splatting 7
5% 6.02 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.86%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 380
Mixed 404
95% 427 MB/s
4K Read 34.9
4K Write 47.2
4K Mixed 36.2
124% 39.5 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 280
DQ Mixed 118
147% 262 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 124%
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB
56GB free, PID 61b6
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
32.6% Below average
Read 74
Write 76.4
Mixed 22.2
69% 57.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.29
4K Write 1.67
4K Mixed 0.33
69% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 Kingston KHX1600C9S3L/8G 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
45.7% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 14.6
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 14
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 350V5C/350V5X/350V4C/350V4X/351V5C/351V5X/351V4C/351V4X/3540VC/3 Builds (Compare 353 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 350V5(C|X) 350V4(C|X) 351V5(C|X) 351V4(C|X) 3540V(C|X)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $77
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback