Lenovo 5536PY8

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics0.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemLenovo 5536PY8  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory2.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100927
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 24 '18 at 07:20
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 540-$99
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
51.1% Above average
Memory 69.4
1-Core 67.8
2-Core 144
55% 93.8 Pts
4-Core 192
8-Core 192
26% 192 Pts
64-Core 194
12% 194 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)
Legend(17AA 3059) 2.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2993
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.6% Terrible
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 1.27
Parallax 0.94
0% 0.87 fps
MRender 1.48
Gravity 0.73
Splatting 1.83
1% 1.35 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.6%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS7250SASUN500G 0751K4MURH 500GB
270GB free
Firmware: K2AOAJ0A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
25.1% Poor
Read 45.1
Write 42
Mixed 39.8
32% 42.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.67
4K Write 1.83
4K Mixed 0.26
91% 0.92 MB/s
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$90
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03.03E03 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
36.3% Below average
Read 65.3
Write 61.4
Mixed 59.8
47% 62.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.08
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.05
10% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT325U7BFR8A-H9 3x2GB
3 of 4 slots used
6GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.4% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 11.7
28% 9.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 7.7
20% 7.13 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $251WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback