Today's hottest deals

Asus N56VB

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus N56VB  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK N56VB
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit,
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20130121
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJan 26 '16 at 03:19
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 99%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Memory 91.3
1-Core 84.9
2-Core 166
68% 114 Pts
4-Core 267
8-Core 396
41% 332 Pts
64-Core 418
26% 418 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Asus(1043 1477) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3308
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.76% Terrible
Lighting 4.17
Reflection 5.58
Parallax 2.88
3% 4.21 fps
MRender 5.1
Gravity 2.33
Splatting 7.96
4% 5.13 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.76%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 750GB-$125
57GB free
Firmware: JA2OA560 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
30.8% Below average
Read 54.4
Write 52.7
Mixed 53.5
40% 53.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 1.25
4K Mixed 0.18
61% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 57%
WD My Book 1142 2TB
24GB free, PID 1142
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Read 31
Write 23.7
Mixed 25.6
33% 26.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.72
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.21
54% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GS6MFR8C-PB 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
29.4% Poor
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 8.2
26% 9 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 9.7
SC Mixed 9.4
27% 9.5 GB/s
Latency 65.3
61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N56VB Builds (Compare 183 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus N56VB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $445
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback