ARLT Quattro Power Station PRO IV / W10 (3080618A-U140-V2.9)

Performance Results


Gaming 51% Yacht	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 40% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	58% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	81.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	ARLT Quattro Power Station PRO IV / W10 (3080618A-U140-V2.9) (all builds)
Motherboard	MSI B85-G41 PC Mate(MS-7850)
Memory	13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150330
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 25 '18 at 16:00
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	19%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4590-$188 151,366 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	82.7% Excellent	Memory 92.5 1-Core 109 2-Core 216 80% 139 Pts	4-Core 422 8-Core 425 56% 423 Pts	64-Core 424 26% 424 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 82.7% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Asus(1043 85B9) 3GB CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing below potential (99^th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (71 fps cap detected)	58% Above average	Lighting 71.5 Reflection 70.7 Parallax 69.6 58% 70.6 fps	MRender 71.9 Gravity 68 Splatting 70.9 58% 70.2 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 58% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 130GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 985 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 427 (B1) Unknown 99 99 4 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 47 37 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 2 (F1) Unknown 99 99 2741343911	81.2% Excellent	Read 492 Write 402 Mixed 419 98% 438 MB/s	4K Read 20.4 4K Write 26.8 4K Mixed 23.4 75% 23.5 MB/s	DQ Read 342 DQ Write 265 DQ Mixed 108 134% 238 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 81.2% Great: 124%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 1.5TB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 140 140 68 (03) Spinup time 128 128 21494169895 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 439 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 985 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 427 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 439 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 439 (C2) HDA temperature 193 193 201864511519 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	94.8% Outstanding	Read 165 Write 166 Mixed 161 124% 164 MB/s	4K Read 0.92 4K Write 1.87 4K Mixed 0.23 98% 1 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 94.8% Great: 108%
Maxtor STM3500320AS 500GB 5,105 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 7GB free Firmware: MX1A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 113 99 57086513 (03) Spinup time 94 94 0 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 5072 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 81 60 134770056 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 8679 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 7 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3519 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 27 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 52 538837024 (C2) HDA temperature 32 48 60129542176 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 40 32 57086513 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	37.8% Below average	Read 70.3 Write 61 Mixed 49.5 45% 60.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.38 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.44 98% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 37.8% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5584-005.A00LF 99U5584-010.A00LF 99U5584-005.A00LF 99U5584-010.A00LF 16GB 43 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	61% Good	MC Read 22.1 MC Write 22.5 MC Mixed 18.2 60% 20.9 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 20.4 SC Mixed 20.3 55% 19.1 GB/s	Latency 63.1 63% 63.1 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 61% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Quattro Power Station PRO IV / W10 (3080618A-U140-V2.9) Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 37%

Jet ski

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

System: ARLT Quattro Power Station PRO IV / W10 (3080618A-U140-V2.9)

CPU
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	1x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	1x

SSD
Burst 120GBPatriotBench 66%, 15,567 samples	2x

RAM
F3-12800CL9-4GBXL Kingston 99U5584-010.A00LF 0420 F3-12800CL9-4GBXL Kingston 99U5584-010.A00LF 16GBUnknownBench 58%, 5 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 83% - Excellent

Total price: $307

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16