Today's hottest deals

HP ProDesk 400 G1 MT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (84%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProDesk 400 G1 MT  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 198E
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140103
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 26 '18 at 04:38
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User GUM-User
Background CPU 84%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4330-$140
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
67.1% Good
Memory 90.1
1-Core 103
2-Core 144
70% 112 Pts
4-Core 254
8-Core 279
35% 266 Pts
64-Core 278
17% 278 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8350
HP(103C 2127) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.1001
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.23% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 2.12
Parallax 1.69
1% 1.73 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 0.83
Splatting 2.09
1% 1.67 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.23%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
573GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP34 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Read 177
Write 130
Mixed 133
110% 146 MB/s
4K Read 0.31
4K Write 0.68
4K Mixed 0.21
49% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 112%
USB Flash Disk 8GB
8GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
6.89% Terrible
Read 23.3
Write 8.16
Mixed 6.32
13% 12.6 MB/s
4K Read 7.27
4K Write 0.004
4K Mixed 0.003
27% 2.42 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.89%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GU6MFR8C-PB 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
32.9% Below average
MC Read 11.3
MC Write 10.7
MC Mixed 9.2
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 11.1
SC Mixed 10.4
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 67.1
60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 400 G1 MT Builds (Compare 1,090 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 400 G1 MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $105
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback