Dell Precision T1600

Performance Results


Gaming 59% Gunboat	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 45% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	79.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	47% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Dell Precision T1600
Motherboard	Dell Precision T1600 (all builds)
Memory	22.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120221
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 28 '18 at 00:42
Run Duration	152 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	8%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E31225 3,353 User benchmarks, average bench 69% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	73.4% Very good	Memory 89.2 1-Core 89.1 2-Core 174 70% 117 Pts	4-Core 334 8-Core 335 45% 335 Pts	64-Core 338 21% 338 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 73.4% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Zotac(19DA 1445) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 390.65 Performing below potential (50^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	79.2% Very good	Lighting 99.1 Reflection 108 Parallax 102 81% 103 fps	MRender 90.1 Gravity 92 Splatting 95.7 76% 92.6 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 79.2% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OWC Mercury Electra 6G SSD 240GB 154 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 149GB free (System drive) Firmware: 501ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 102 102 6902643 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 0 -115199612811762 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1059 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 135 (B1) Unknown 0 0 2 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 34 54 47248179234 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 6902643 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 6902643 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 6902643 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 2238 (EA) Unknown 0 0 2572 (F1) Unknown 0 0 2572 (F2) Unknown 0 0 1319	47% Average	Read 347 Write 122 Mixed 173 47% 214 MB/s	4K Read 19.1 4K Write 36.2 4K Mixed 13.5 65% 22.9 MB/s	DQ Read 189 DQ Write 89.4 DQ Mixed 9.96 42% 95.9 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 47% Great: 82%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$56 127,507 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 758GB free Firmware: SDM1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 79 65 86447388 (03) Spinup time 100 99 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 332 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 69 60 8461384 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 -124691490537158 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 103 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 99 99 1 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 74 64 521797658 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 10 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 29 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 475 (C2) HDA temperature 26 40 68719476762 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -130528351092446 (F1) Unknown 100 253 1230013969 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1298093270 (FE) Unknown 100 100 0	49.3% Average	Read 109 Write 62.7 Mixed 60.6 58% 77.3 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.13 4K Mixed 0.53 140% 1.22 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 49.3% Great: 70%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 391GB free Firmware: 19.01H19 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 153 143 3341 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3023 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 71 71 21556 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1840 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 125 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2897 (C2) HDA temperature 102 96 41 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 72 72 20847 (F1) Unknown 200 200 44241843172 (F2) Unknown 200 200 65078084625	64% Good	Read 129 Write 94.2 Mixed 108 83% 110 MB/s	4K Read 0.58 4K Write 1.92 4K Mixed 0.39 103% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 64% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-1600C9-4GAO Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G 04CD F3-1600C9-4GAO Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G 24GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	50.9% Above average	MC Read 17.6 MC Write 18.5 MC Mixed 16.4 50% 17.5 GB/s	SC Read 12.8 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 15.5 42% 14.8 GB/s	Latency 68.2 59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 50.9% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Precision T1600 Builds (Compare 569 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell Precision T1600

CPU
Xeon E31225IntelBench 69%, 3,353 samples	197x
Xeon E3-1245IntelBench 70%, 3,302 samples	161x
Xeon E31270IntelBench 71%, 3,539 samples	96x

GPU
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	52x
Quadro 600NvidiaBench 3%, 15,964 samples	47x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	41x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	22x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	10x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	10x

RAM
M378B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 11,003 samples	9x
M378B5273DH0-CH9 4x4GBSamsungBench 49%, 2,942 samples	9x
M378B5273CH0-CH9 4x4GBSamsungBench 49%, 1,553 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397