Asus ROG STRIX X99 GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 54% Yacht	Desktop 100% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 50% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	48.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	300% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX X99 GAMING (all builds)
Memory	24.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20170915
Uptime	3.3 Days
Run Date	Jan 28 '18 at 01:54
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	HRV-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6850K-$115 29,279 User benchmarks, average bench 84% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	92.3% Outstanding	Memory 95.4 1-Core 131 2-Core 262 91% 163 Pts	4-Core 479 8-Core 837 80% 658 Pts	64-Core 1,034 64% 1,034 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 92.3% Great: 93%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329 50,279 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Asus(1043 8499) 3GB CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 390.65 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	48.7% Average	Lighting 59.3 Reflection 53.1 Parallax 70.7 48% 61 fps	MRender 69.2 Gravity 63.9 Splatting 51.4 49% 61.5 fps
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 48.7% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB 21,747 User benchmarks, average bench 219% 114GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXZ7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	300% Outstanding	Read 2,684 Write 965 Mixed 1,481 374% 1,710 MB/s	4K Read 62.6 4K Write 250 4K Mixed 72.3 320% 128 MB/s	DQ Read 909 DQ Write 766 DQ Mixed 296 369% 657 MB/s
Poor: 134% ↑ This bench: 300% Great: 292%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$146 23,740 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 1.5TB free Firmware: FP2A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 6948 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 679 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 74 74 10646 (0A) Spinup retry count 113 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 358 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 7 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 229 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 9825 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 231929217067 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 253 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 82 82 7332 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 290 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	83.9% Excellent	Read 147 Write 146 Mixed 135 107% 143 MB/s	4K Read 1.25 4K Write 2.14 4K Mixed 0.24 119% 1.21 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 83.9% Great: 104%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 215GB free Firmware: CC25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 112 99 45433032 (03) Spinup time 95 93 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1087 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 72 60 20495706 (09) Power-on hours count 84 84 14799 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 792 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 98 4295688203 (BD) vendor-specific 99 99 1 (BE) vendor-specific 63 50 756875301 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 198 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 77 77 47622 (C2) HDA temperature 37 50 51539607589 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 32585916886609 (F1) Unknown 100 253 14847406437 (F2) Unknown 100 253 102617221991	94.1% Outstanding	Read 166 Write 162 Mixed 134 115% 154 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 1.66 4K Mixed 0.2 74% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 94.1% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Avexir DDR4-3000 CL16 8GB 4x8GB 35 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	131% Outstanding	MC Read 45 MC Write 60.6 MC Mixed 49.2 147% 51.6 GB/s	SC Read 14.1 SC Write 22.1 SC Mixed 22.1 56% 19.4 GB/s	Latency 55.9 72% 55.9 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 131% Great: 131%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical STRIX X99 GAMING Builds (Compare 1,331 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 84%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 84%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 76%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X99 GAMING - $300

CPU
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	523x
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	258x
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	242x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	283x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	173x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	155x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	55x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	41x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	41x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	21x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 87%, 76,101 samples	20x
CT8G4DFS824A.C8FHD1 2x8GBCrucialBench 71%, 3,272 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $897

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16