Asus M51AC

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	2.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	88% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Asus M51AC (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK M51AC
Memory	9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130402
Uptime	1.6 Days
Run Date	Jan 29 '18 at 15:48
Run Duration	274 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770-$75 176,321 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	79.4% Very good	Memory 90.4 1-Core 107 2-Core 221 80% 140 Pts	4-Core 370 8-Core 548 57% 459 Pts	64-Core 554 34% 554 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 79.4% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 625 1,691 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 844C) 2GB CLim: 873 MHz, MLim: 350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 375.63 Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	2.1% Terrible	Lighting 2.57 Reflection 3.19 Parallax 1.97 2% 2.58 fps	MRender 3.1 Gravity 2.53 Splatting 2.26 2% 2.63 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.1% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 101GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 33607 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 274 (B1) Unknown 92 92 93 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 55 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 48 (F1) Unknown 99 99 48779341466	88% Excellent	Read 499 Write 339 Mixed 353 88% 397 MB/s	4K Read 36.6 4K Write 64.6 4K Mixed 24.3 121% 41.8 MB/s	DQ Read 337 DQ Write 181 DQ Mixed 32.3 84% 183 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 88% Great: 118%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 331GB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 139 139 70 (03) Spinup time 128 128 25789268264 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 17386 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 35560 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 370 (C0) Power-off retract count 86 86 17435 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 86 86 17435 (C2) HDA temperature 222 222 180389740571 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	60.7% Good	Read 103 Write 108 Mixed 100 78% 104 MB/s	4K Read 0.67 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.21 79% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 108%
Generic- SD/MMC 0GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 2% 0GB free, PID 6362 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	3.33% Terrible	Read 7.54 Write 5.78 Mixed 6.21 8% 6.51 MB/s	4K Read 2.74 4K Write 0.11 4K Mixed 0.1 17% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 3.33% Great: 3%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ASU16D3LU1KBG/8G 2x8GB 954 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	57.2% Above average	MC Read 21.1 MC Write 21.2 MC Mixed 17 56% 19.8 GB/s	SC Read 14.7 SC Write 19.6 SC Mixed 17.3 49% 17.2 GB/s	Latency 66.7 60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 57.2% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M51AC Builds (Compare 627 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Raft

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

System: Asus M51AC

CPU
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	385x
Core i7-4770SIntel $102Bench 71%, 13,157 samples	125x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	33x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	43x
GeForce GT 640NvidiaBench 6%, 34,519 samples	41x
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	35x

SSD
MX500 1TBCrucial $66Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	15x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	15x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	13x

RAM
MI64C1D1629Z1 2x8GBAdataBench 54%, 2,816 samples	78x
MI64C1D1629Z1 1x8GBAdataBench 31%, 1,606 samples	36x
AO2L16BC8R2-BR2S 2x8GBUnknownBench 56%, 671 samples	36x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 90% - Outstanding

Total price: $200

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16